[PATCH 6/9] [PATCH] x86: split safe_smp_processor_id

[Glauber Costa]

This implementation in x86_64 is clean and consistent, but we
sacrifice it for the sake of being equal to i386 (since the other
way around would be harder).

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/asm-x86/smp_64.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-x86/smp_64.h b/include/asm-x86/smp_64.h
index eead92e..8ea4952 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/smp_64.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/smp_64.h
@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ static inline int num_booting_cpus(void)
 	return cpus_weight(cpu_callout_map);
 }
 
+#define safe_smp_processor_id()		smp_processor_id()
 #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
 #define stack_smp_processor_id() 0
-
+#define safe_smp_processor_id() 0
 #endif /* !CONFIG_SMP */
 
-#define safe_smp_processor_id()		smp_processor_id()
 
 #endif
 
-- 
1.5.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/