Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64: Add UV specific header for MMR definitions

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue Mar 25 2008 - 20:08:36 EST


On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> bitfields are only problematic on portable code, which this isn't.

it's still crappy to read and a bad example for others. And last time
I heard about UV it also included an ia64 version, but that's been
loooong ago.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/