Re: [PATCH 109/148] include/asm-x86/serial.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting only

[JÃrn Engel]

On Tue, 25 March 2008 11:48:41 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> So, in the specific example of the scheduler subsystem, i've only 
> observed advantages to checkpatch and zero downsides. Could anyone give 
> me _any_ objective reason why i shouldnt be using checkpatch for the 
> scheduler? More broadly, could anyone give me an objective reason why we 
> shouldnt be doing it for arch/x86? And even more broadly, could anyone 
> give me an objective reason why we shouldnt be doing it for all actively 
> maintained areas of the kernel?

Disagreement between checkpatch and maintainers preferred style.  I've
had a patch that fixed a bug and - while in the region - "cleaned up"
the style for a single line.  This line no longer matches the rest of
the file and creates the kind of visual distraction you complain about.

In short, for a file with an active maintainer whatever the maintainer
prefers should be done.  Doing a full checkpatch sweep against a
maintainers wishes is madness, doing a partial "cleanup" is worse.
Of course when a maintainer likes checkpatch, as you do, there is no
disagreement to deal with. :)

JÃrn

-- 
I don't understand it. Nobody does.
-- Richard P. Feynman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/