Re: [PATCH 0/5] Generic smp_call_function(), improvements, and smp_call_function_single()

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Sat Mar 22 2008 - 08:29:25 EST


On Fri, Mar 21 2008, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > My thinking was that it may need a bit of help to ensure that the init
> > function for single call data works,
>
> The problem may be worse than that. I see that you have a per-cpu
> "call_single_queue" on which you do some list operations. On ia64
> the per-cpu variables live at the same virtual address on each processor
> with a per-cpu TLB mapping directing them to a different physical
> address on each. This makes Linux lists very confused.

Funky, how does accessing other CPU's per-cpu variables work on ia64
then? Perhaps I made some false assumptions. Unfortunately I have no
access to any IA64 machines, so I either have to yank the ia64 bits
(which is unfortunate, since Alan tests on those :-) or rely on a bit of
help from you and/or others in getting that bit right.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/