Re: [PATCH REPOST] [3/3] Replace macro recursion with more conventionalloop

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Mar 21 2008 - 15:33:38 EST


On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 06:07:55PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > The early exception handlers are currently set up using a macro
> > > recursion. Replace that with a standard loop.
> > >
> > > Noop patch, just a cleanup.
> >
> > Cleanups before code changes please.
>
> It relies on the earlier changes.

I just had a closer look. Your patch order makes sense. It's less
noise that way due to the previous removal of the 3 users of the macro.

I applied the series with the following changes:

- Moved 3/3 before 2/3 to make it clear that this is a consecutive cleanup
- Simplified 3/3 (patch below)
- fixed the commit log of 3/3 so it points out why the cleanup is done

Btw, can you please add a "x86:" prefix to your subject lines ?

Thanks,

tglx
--

The early exception handlers are currently set up using a macro
recursion. There is only one user left. Replace the macro with a
standard loop in place.

--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -269,15 +269,12 @@ bad_address:

.section ".init.text","ax"
#ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK
-.macro early_idt_tramp i
- movl $\i, %esi
- jmp early_idt_handler
-.endm
.globl early_idt_handlers
early_idt_handlers:
i = 0
.rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS
- early_idt_tramp i
+ movl $i, %esi
+ jmp early_idt_handler
i = i + 1
.endr
#endif

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/