Re: [PATCH] x86: simplify sync_test_bit()
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Mar 21 2008 - 07:18:54 EST
* Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There really is no need for a redundant implementation here, just keep
> the alternative name for allowing consumers to use consistent naming.
> - __asm__ __volatile__("btl %2,%1\n\tsbbl %0,%0"
> - :"=r" (oldbit)
> - :"m" (ADDR),"Ir" (nr));
> +#define sync_test_bit test_bit
thanks, applied.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/