Re: [patch 00/11] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall(v9)

[James Morris]

On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> > We might need a user_mount hook which is called once the core kernel code 
> > determines that it is a a valid unprivileged mount (although the sb_mount 
> > hook will already have been called, IIUC).
> 
> Does the order matter between core code's and the security module's
> permission checks?

Yes, the model is DAC before MAC.

>  If it does, the cleanest would be to just move the
> core checks before the sb_mount hook, no?

Correct.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/