Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc4

[Anders Eriksson]

bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx said:
> This commit is also _after_ the previously "guilty" one (commit
> 852738f39258deafb3d89c187cb1a4050820d555)?

Yep.

> IIRC we've agreed that bisection between 2.6.24 and commit 8527* was needed?

I did that first, and it pointed to  8527* as the bad one. During this bisect 
I took care to always start from a 2.6.24 .config, and do a make oldconfig from 
that. A clean series of good emerged.. Unfortunately I don't have the configs 
from the previous runs saved.

Given this, I concluded that the configs had to play a role in making a 
version go bad, so I decided to do another one between  8527* and 2.6.25-rc1
always based on the  8527* config (which _worked_ when tested with the 2.6.24 
config dragged forward. So the upped end of the first bisect was badly chosen)

The attahed was the result of that latter run...

> Thanks, 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/