Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions

From: Dmitry Adamushko
Date: Fri Feb 22 2008 - 03:36:50 EST


Hi Max,

> [ ... ]
> Last patch to the stop machine is potentially unsafe and is marked as experimental. Unfortunately
> it's currently the only option that allows dynamic module insertion/removal for above scenarios.

I'm puzzled by the following part (can be a misunderstanding from my side)

+config CPUISOL_STOPMACHINE
+ bool "Do not halt isolated CPUs with Stop Machine (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+ depends on CPUISOL && STOP_MACHINE && EXPERIMENTAL
+ help
+ If this option is enabled kernel will not halt isolated CPUs
+ when Stop Machine is triggered. Stop Machine is currently only
+ used by the module insertion and removal.

this "only" part. What about e.g. a 'cpu hotplug' case (_cpu_down())?
(or we should abstract it a bit to the point that e.g. a cpu can be
considered as 'a module'? :-)


--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/