Re: [PATCH] latencytop: Change Kconfig dependency.

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Feb 01 2008 - 08:32:52 EST



* Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
> > def_bool y
> >
> > +config HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
> > + def_bool y
> > +
> No.
> Please do:
> config X86
> + select HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
>
> Yes - this is a valid use of select.

i see - and there's lots of other examples of this and other similar
things in other architectures as well. Could we do that as a separate
cleanup patch instead, to keep the Kconfig file consistently structured.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/