Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Jan 29 2008 00:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>I remember that there were some small things missing in CIFS for 
>completely replacing the unmaintained smbfs when we discussed removing 
>smbfs back in 2005 due to smbfs being unmaintained.
>
>CIFS has improved since, smbfs is still unmaintained, and it's becoming 
>time to finally remove smbfs.

Negative. CIFS as of 2.6.24-rc7 still does not support Windows 98,
or at least, the mount command I tried was not the right one:

	mount -t cifs //WIN98/c /mnt -o guest,sec=none

(It is a test share with a null password open for anyone.) I am running
out of options..

	CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/