Re: [PATCH 1/1] Net: e100, fix iomap mem accesses

From: Kok, Auke
Date: Mon Jan 28 2008 - 17:32:58 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:38:51 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> readX functions are not permitted on iomap-ped space change to ioreadX,
>>> also pci_unmap pci_map-ped space on exit (instead of iounmap).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/e100.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c
>>> index 51cf577..47548ef 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/e100.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
>>> @@ -1836,7 +1836,7 @@ static int e100_rx_indicate(struct nic *nic, struct rx *rx,
>>> if ((le16_to_cpu(rfd->command) & cb_el) &&
>>> (RU_RUNNING == nic->ru_running))
>>>
>>> - if (readb(&nic->csr->scb.status) & rus_no_res)
>>> + if (ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.status) & rus_no_res)
>>> nic->ru_running = RU_SUSPENDED;
>>> return -ENODATA;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ static int e100_rx_indicate(struct nic *nic, struct rx *rx,
>>> if ((le16_to_cpu(rfd->command) & cb_el) &&
>>> (RU_RUNNING == nic->ru_running)) {
>>>
>>> - if (readb(&nic->csr->scb.status) & rus_no_res)
>>> + if (ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.status) & rus_no_res)
>>> nic->ru_running = RU_SUSPENDED;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ static void e100_rx_clean(struct nic *nic, unsigned int *work_done,
>>>
>>> if(restart_required) {
>>> // ack the rnr?
>>> - writeb(stat_ack_rnr, &nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
>>> + iowrite8(stat_ack_rnr, &nic->csr->scb.stat_ack);
>>> e100_start_receiver(nic, nic->rx_to_clean);
>>> if(work_done)
>>> (*work_done)++;
>>> @@ -2774,7 +2774,7 @@ static void __devexit e100_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>> unregister_netdev(netdev);
>>> e100_free(nic);
>>> - iounmap(nic->csr);
>>> + pci_iounmap(pdev, nic->csr);
>>> free_netdev(netdev);
>>> pci_release_regions(pdev);
>> ACK, but patch doesn't seem to apply...
>
> It's been a week, nothing seems to have happened and the e100 maintainers
> are asleep.

not asleep, just pleasantly stuck on an atol in the south pacific, far far away
from LCA :)

> Please resend when convenient. Maybe more luodly or something, I dunno.

just repost to me and Jeff and I'll pick it up this week if Jeff does not.

I think the recent non-cache coherent fixes might have messed up the merge.

Auke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/