Re: [PATCH] cgroup: limit block I/O bandwidth

[Pavel Emelyanov]

Andrea Righi wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> * Andrea Righi <righiandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-01-23 16:23:59]:
>>
>>> Probably tracking who dirtied the pages would be the best approach, but
>>> we want also to reduce the overhead of this tracking. So, we should find
>>> a smart way to track which cgroup dirtied the pages and then only when
>>> the i/o scheduler dispatches the write requests of those pages, account
>>> the i/o operations to the opportune cgroup. In this way throttling could
>>> be done probably in __set_page_dirty() as well.
>>>
>> I think the OpenVZ controller works that way.
> 
> Well... looking at the code it seems that OpenVZ doesn't use this
> strategy, instead performs UBC-based I/O accounting looking at the

We do track the task (well - the beancounter) who made the page
dirty and then use this context for async write scheduling.

> __set_page_dirty*() for writes and submit_bio() for reads. Then,
> independently from accounting data, it uses per-UBC i/o priority model
> that is mapped directly on the CFQ i/o priority model.

Vasisly Tarasov (out I/O guru ;)) has already prepared an RFC patchset
for Jens with group scheduler (for sync requests only) and is going to
send it this or next week.

> -Andrea
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/