Re: [RESEND][PATCH-2.6.24-rc8] Fix fakephp deadlock

From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Jan 23 2008 - 12:51:51 EST


On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +0000, Ian Abbott wrote:
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include "../pci.h"
> #if !defined(MODULE)
> @@ -63,10 +64,13 @@ struct dummy_slot {
> struct list_head node;
> struct hotplug_slot *slot;
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> + struct work_struct remove_work;
> + unsigned long removed;

You are treating "removed" as an atomic value, so why not just make it
an atomic_t?

And what is protecting the fact that the flag could be set right after
it gets checked? I don't see a lock here :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/