Re: [PATCH] procfs: constify function pointer tables

[Bryan Wu]

On Jan 23, 2008 7:25 PM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jan 23 2008 18:41, Bryan Wu wrote:
> >Oh, this patch does not touch all, following is the missing list:
> >---
> [...]
> >arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c:static struct seq_operations ioc_seq_ops = {
> >arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c:struct seq_operations pfm_seq_ops = {
> >arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c:struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = {
> >arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn2_smp.c:static struct seq_operations
> (and more)
> [...]
>
> They were sent as other separate patches to each maintainer.
> (without lkml, would have been a needless patchbomb.)
>

Oh, don't know that. I worried a lot, -:))

-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/