Re: x86: remove casts

[Andy Whitcroft]

On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:56:05PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Jan 18 2008 11:45, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >* Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> This is against x86/mm.
> >
> >hm, it has checkpatch failures -
> 
> All false positives.

The spacing thing is definately a matter for argument elsewhere.  I
cirtainly have no real oppinion on the matter.  As has been said
elsewhere the coding style is not meant to be as everyone likes it, more
a minimally offensive common position generating consistancy out of
caos.

Checkpatch is _meant_ to push you towards the recommendations in
CodingStyle, that is the definative resource; common sense should prevail
over it.  <standard message>checkpatch is a style guide only, think
about its output and be prepared to justify any non-complience.</standard
message>.

The second one is a clear falsie which I believe I have fixed for the
next release, rather over zelous "possible type" detection has fired here.

ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
#123: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c:248:
+                         EXT_SIGNATURE_SIZE * i;

Cheers.

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/