Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] x86: Make page fault oopses similar

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 16:30:53 EST


On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:20:46 -0800
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Introduce printk_address to X86_32 in a simplified form for
> now. Reformat X86_64 printk_address to avoid two declarations.
>
> Change the printk formats on X86_32 and 64 to be similar.

I'm not entirely convinced on this; I need to look closer but it appears the 32 bit version
doesn't use the "reliable" argument to print a ? in front of the dubious backtrace entries;
that would be sort of a step backwards; (

--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/