Re: [PATCH] x86_64: update e820 instead of updating end_pfn

[Yinghai Lu]

On Jan 20, 2008 1:20 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > [PATCH] x86_64: update e820 instead of updating end_pfn
> >
> > when mtrr is not covering all e820 table, need to trim the ram, need
> > to update e820
>
> ok, i like this approach even more - applied. Would you like to have a
> shot at adding mtrr_trim_uncached_memory() to 32-bit too? It is affected
> by the same problem (if not more).

for 32 bit, it could use the same mtrr_trim_uncached_memory.

but we need to move mtrr_bp_init calling into setup_arch.

YH

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/