Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mappedfiles

[Matt Mackall]

On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:54 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:47:33 -0800 (PST)
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >  - keep it simple. Let's face it, Linux has never ever given those 
> >    guarantees before, and it's not is if anybody has really cared. Even 
> >    now, the issue seems to be more about paper standards conformance than 
> >    anything else.
> 
> There is one issue which is way more than just standards conformance.
> 
> When a program changes file data through mmap(), at some point the
> mtime needs to be update so that backup programs know to back up the
> new version of the file.
> 
> Backup programs not seeing an updated mtime is a really big deal.

And that's fixed with the 4-line approach.

Reminds me, I've got a patch here for addressing that problem with loop mounts:

Writes to loop should update the mtime of the underlying file.

Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Index: l/drivers/block/loop.c
===================================================================
--- l.orig/drivers/block/loop.c	2007-11-05 17:50:07.000000000 -0600
+++ l/drivers/block/loop.c	2007-11-05 19:03:51.000000000 -0600
@@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ static int do_lo_send_aops(struct loop_d
 	offset = pos & ((pgoff_t)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
 	bv_offs = bvec->bv_offset;
 	len = bvec->bv_len;
+	file_update_time(file);
 	while (len > 0) {
 		sector_t IV;
 		unsigned size;
@@ -299,6 +300,7 @@ static int __do_lo_send_write(struct fil
 
 	set_fs(get_ds());
 	bw = file->f_op->write(file, buf, len, &pos);
+	file_update_time(file);
 	set_fs(old_fs);
 	if (likely(bw == len))
 		return 0;


-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/