Re: [patch 2/3] Latencytop instrumentations part 1

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This patch contains the first set of instrumentations for latencytop;
> each instrumentation needs to be evaluated for usefulness before this
> can go into mainline; posting here just to show how the infrastructure
> can be used
> [...]

Can you suggest of some reason why all this instrumentation could
not be in the form of standard markers (perhaps conditionally
compiled out if necessary)?

- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/