Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9564] New: Uninitialzed variable fieldscvt.h_margin and cvt.v_margin

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Jan 18 2008 - 17:01:20 EST


On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:54:59 -0800 (PST)
bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9564
>
> Summary: Uninitialzed variable fields cvt.h_margin and
> cvt.v_margin
> Product: Drivers
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.23
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Video(Other)
> AssignedTo: drivers_video-other@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ReportedBy: marciobuss@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
> The errors can be found at drivers/video/fbcvt.c as follows:
>
> (1) the test "if (margin)" at line 310 evaluates to false,
> (2) this makes the test "if (cvt.flags & FB_CVT_FLAG_MARGINS)" at line 352
> to evaluate to false as well
> (3) now cvt.h_margin is uninitialized at line 359, 368, and 370, and
> cvt.v_margin is uninitizalied at line 371.
>
> In other words, both cvt.v_margin and cvt.h_margin are initialized conditinally
> but used unconditionally. This bug is a false positive only if the parameter
> "margins" at line 304 is never 0. However, this would make the test at line
> 310 unnecessary -- anyone looking at the code is miled into believing that
> 0 is a legal value for "margins". This means the code does require some change
> in my humble opinion.
>

Could someone please take a look at this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/