Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incrementalfsck)

[H. Peter Anvin]

Bryan Henderson wrote:
> We weren't actually talking about writing out the cache.  While that was 
> part of an earlier thread which ultimately conceded that disk drives most 
> probably do not use the spinning disk energy to write out the cache, the 
> claim was then made that the drive at least survives long enough to finish 
> writing the sector it was writing, thereby maintaining the integrity of 
> the data at the drive level.  People often say that a disk drive 
> guarantees atomic writes at the sector level even in the face of a power 
> failure.
>
> But I heard some years ago from a disk drive engineer that that is a myth 
> just like the rotational energy thing.  I added that to the discussion, 
> but admitted that I haven't actually seen a disk drive write a partial 
> sector.

Did he work for Maxtor, by any chance?  :-/

A disk drive whose power is cut needs to have enough residual power to 
park its heads (or *massive* data loss will occur), and at that point it 
might as well keep enough on hand to finish an in-progress sector write.

There are two possible sources of onboard temporary power: a large 
enough capacitor, or the rotational energy of the platters (an 
electrical motor also being a generator.)  I don't care which one they 
use, but they need to do something.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/