Re: [PATCH] [0/7] Some random x86 patches that should all go intogit-x86

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Jan 18 2008 - 04:44:10 EST

Next message: Jakob Oestergaard: "Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?"
Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "[PATCH] [5/7] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64 early boot code with dynamic table v2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Some are reposts, some are not. See patch descriptions for details. I
> believe I addressed all feedback that made sense in the reposted
> patches.

thanks Andi, i've picked them up.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jakob Oestergaard: "Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?"
Previous message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "[PATCH] [5/7] Replace hard coded reservations in x86-64 early boot code with dynamic table v2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]