RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Date: Thu Jan 17 2008 - 18:41:56 EST




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andreas Herrmann3 [mailto:andreas.herrmann3@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:25 PM
>To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>Cc: Ingo Molnar; Siddha, Suresh B; ak@xxxxxx;
>ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx; rdreier@xxxxxxxxx;
>torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxx;
>airlied@xxxxxxxxx; davej@xxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>hpa@xxxxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>Barnes, Jesse; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental
>changes and bug fixes
>
>On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:04:10PM -0800, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
>>
>> Below is another potential fix for the problem here. Going
>through ACPI
>> ioremap usages, we found at one place the mapping is cached
>for possible
>> optimization reason and not unmapped later. Patch below always unmaps
>> ioremap at this place in ACPICA.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Venki
>>
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6.git/drivers/acpi/executer/exregion.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/drivers/acpi/executer/exregion.c
>2008-01-17 03:18:39.000000000 -0800
>> +++ linux-2.6.git/drivers/acpi/executer/exregion.c
>2008-01-17 07:34:33.000000000 -0800
>> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
>> #define _COMPONENT ACPI_EXECUTER
>> ACPI_MODULE_NAME("exregion")
>>
>> +static int ioremap_cache;
>> +
>>
>/**************************************************************
>*****************
>> *
>> * FUNCTION: acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler
>> @@ -249,6 +251,13 @@
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> + if (!ioremap_cache) {
>> + acpi_os_unmap_memory(mem_info->mapped_logical_address,
>> + window_size);
>> + mem_info->mapped_logical_address = 0;
>> + mem_info->mapped_physical_address = 0;
>> + mem_info->mapped_length = 0;
>> + }
>> return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
>> }
>>
>
>
>Applying and compiling your patch I see:
>
> CC drivers/acpi/executer/exregion.o
>drivers/acpi/executer/exregion.c: In function
>'acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler':
>drivers/acpi/executer/exregion.c:81: warning: 'window_size'
>may be used uninitialized in this function
>
>
>After glancing through this file it seems that ioremap_cache
>is always 0
>and acpi_os_unmap_memory will unconditionally be executed at
>end of this function.
>I am not familiar with that code. But I just want to reinsure that this
>is what you want. And if so, why is that variable needed?
>But maybe I missed something ...

I missed that warning. But should not matter for testing this patch as
we always initialize window_size with the patch.

Yes. The variable is not needed. With patch I always map at the
beginning of this function and unmap at the end. I just kept the
variable as I was planning to add a boot option to control this
initially. But, later decided to keep the test patch simple without any
boot option.
We can come up with a better patch once we know that the test patch
helps.

Thanks,
Venki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/