Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

[H. Peter Anvin]

Andreas Herrmann3 wrote:
> Yes, we must fix all aliases or reject the conflicting mapping.
> But fixing all aliases might not be that easy.
> (I've just seen a panic when using your patch ;-(

Avoiding inconsistent aliases is definitely fundamental to supporting PAT.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/