RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

[Pallipadi, Venkatesh]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@xxxxxx] 
>Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:02 PM
>To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>Cc: Andreas Herrmann; ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>rdreier@xxxxxxxxx; torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>gregkh@xxxxxxx; airlied@xxxxxxxxx; davej@xxxxxxxxxx; 
>mingo@xxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; hpa@xxxxxxxxx; 
>akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Barnes, Jesse; 
>davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Siddha, Suresh B
>Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental 
>changes and bug fixes
>
>> This ioremap failing seems to be the real problem. This can be due to
>> new tracking of ioremaps introduced by PAT patches. We do not allow
>> conflicting ioremaps to same region. Probably that is happening
>
>Normally if there is a conflict there should be a printk (or 
>at least it was
>so in the original mattr code if you haven't changed it)
>

Yes. Printks are there. But are with KERN_DEBUG now. We should change
them to WARNING atleast.

Thanks,
Venki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/