Re: [patch for 2.6.24? 1/1] cpufreq: Initialise default governor before use

[Johannes Weiner]

Hi,

Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:

> * akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
>> +fs_initcall(cpufreq_gov_dbs_init);
>> +#else
>>  module_init(cpufreq_gov_dbs_init);
>> +#endif
>
> silly question: why not unconditional fs_initcall() ?

Would there be a way to avoid the fs_initcall at all?

Otherwise, this is just a psychological thing to show, hey, this still
sucks, find a better solution.  But perhaps the plain fs_initcall is
marker enough for that fact.

	Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/