Re: mtime updates for mmapped files.

[Dave Young]

On Jan 16, 2008 5:46 PM, Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I  wrote a small app yesterday that updates a file by mmapping the
> file (RW), changing the thing around, and then exiting.
>
> This did not trigger a change in the mtime of the file. Thus rsync
> didn't pick up that the file had changed.
>
> I understand that tracking every change to a RW mmapped file is
> costly, and thus unfeasable, but shouldn't then the close cause a
> mtime update?
>
> The server where this happened is running 2.6.21, so my apologies if
> this has already been corrected.

This is an old bug, don't know if it was fixed or not. Please see
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/17/138

>
>         Roger.
>
> --
> ** R.E.Wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxx ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
> **    Delftechpark 26 2628 XH  Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233    **
> *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
> Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
> Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
> Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/