Re: [patch 4/9] unprivileged mounts: propagate error values fromclone_mnt

From: Serge E. Hallyn
Date: Mon Jan 14 2008 - 17:29:23 EST


Quoting Miklos Szeredi (miklos@xxxxxxxxxx):
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
>
> Allow clone_mnt() to return errors other than ENOMEM. This will be used for
> returning a different error value when the number of user mounts goes over the
> limit.
>
> Fix copy_tree() to return EPERM for unbindable mounts.
>
> Don't propagate further from dup_mnt_ns() as that copy_tree() can only fail
> with -ENOMEM.

I see what you're saying, but it just seems like it's bound to be more
confusing this way.

What's the reason to insist on doing this? To force people to think
about it as a form of documentation?

Still,

> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>
> Index: linux/fs/namespace.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/namespace.c 2008-01-04 13:47:09.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/fs/namespace.c 2008-01-04 13:47:49.000000000 +0100
> @@ -512,41 +512,42 @@ static struct vfsmount *clone_mnt(struct
> struct super_block *sb = old->mnt_sb;
> struct vfsmount *mnt = alloc_vfsmnt(old->mnt_devname);
>
> - if (mnt) {
> - mnt->mnt_flags = old->mnt_flags;
> - atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
> - mnt->mnt_sb = sb;
> - mnt->mnt_root = dget(root);
> - mnt->mnt_mountpoint = mnt->mnt_root;
> - mnt->mnt_parent = mnt;
> -
> - /* don't copy the MNT_USER flag */
> - mnt->mnt_flags &= ~MNT_USER;
> - if (flag & CL_SETUSER)
> - set_mnt_user(mnt);
> -
> - if (flag & CL_SLAVE) {
> - list_add(&mnt->mnt_slave, &old->mnt_slave_list);
> - mnt->mnt_master = old;
> - CLEAR_MNT_SHARED(mnt);
> - } else if (!(flag & CL_PRIVATE)) {
> - if ((flag & CL_PROPAGATION) || IS_MNT_SHARED(old))
> - list_add(&mnt->mnt_share, &old->mnt_share);
> - if (IS_MNT_SLAVE(old))
> - list_add(&mnt->mnt_slave, &old->mnt_slave);
> - mnt->mnt_master = old->mnt_master;
> - }
> - if (flag & CL_MAKE_SHARED)
> - set_mnt_shared(mnt);
> + if (!mnt)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - /* stick the duplicate mount on the same expiry list
> - * as the original if that was on one */
> - if (flag & CL_EXPIRE) {
> - spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
> - if (!list_empty(&old->mnt_expire))
> - list_add(&mnt->mnt_expire, &old->mnt_expire);
> - spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
> - }
> + mnt->mnt_flags = old->mnt_flags;
> + atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
> + mnt->mnt_sb = sb;
> + mnt->mnt_root = dget(root);
> + mnt->mnt_mountpoint = mnt->mnt_root;
> + mnt->mnt_parent = mnt;
> +
> + /* don't copy the MNT_USER flag */
> + mnt->mnt_flags &= ~MNT_USER;
> + if (flag & CL_SETUSER)
> + set_mnt_user(mnt);
> +
> + if (flag & CL_SLAVE) {
> + list_add(&mnt->mnt_slave, &old->mnt_slave_list);
> + mnt->mnt_master = old;
> + CLEAR_MNT_SHARED(mnt);
> + } else if (!(flag & CL_PRIVATE)) {
> + if ((flag & CL_PROPAGATION) || IS_MNT_SHARED(old))
> + list_add(&mnt->mnt_share, &old->mnt_share);
> + if (IS_MNT_SLAVE(old))
> + list_add(&mnt->mnt_slave, &old->mnt_slave);
> + mnt->mnt_master = old->mnt_master;
> + }
> + if (flag & CL_MAKE_SHARED)
> + set_mnt_shared(mnt);
> +
> + /* stick the duplicate mount on the same expiry list
> + * as the original if that was on one */
> + if (flag & CL_EXPIRE) {
> + spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
> + if (!list_empty(&old->mnt_expire))
> + list_add(&mnt->mnt_expire, &old->mnt_expire);
> + spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
> }
> return mnt;
> }
> @@ -1021,11 +1022,11 @@ struct vfsmount *copy_tree(struct vfsmou
> struct nameidata nd;
>
> if (!(flag & CL_COPY_ALL) && IS_MNT_UNBINDABLE(mnt))
> - return NULL;
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
>
> res = q = clone_mnt(mnt, dentry, flag);
> - if (!q)
> - goto Enomem;
> + if (IS_ERR(q))
> + goto error;
> q->mnt_mountpoint = mnt->mnt_mountpoint;
>
> p = mnt;
> @@ -1046,8 +1047,8 @@ struct vfsmount *copy_tree(struct vfsmou
> nd.path.mnt = q;
> nd.path.dentry = p->mnt_mountpoint;
> q = clone_mnt(p, p->mnt_root, flag);
> - if (!q)
> - goto Enomem;
> + if (IS_ERR(q))
> + goto error;
> spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
> list_add_tail(&q->mnt_list, &res->mnt_list);
> attach_mnt(q, &nd);
> @@ -1055,7 +1056,7 @@ struct vfsmount *copy_tree(struct vfsmou
> }
> }
> return res;
> -Enomem:
> + error:
> if (res) {
> LIST_HEAD(umount_list);
> spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
> @@ -1063,7 +1064,7 @@ Enomem:
> spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
> release_mounts(&umount_list);
> }
> - return NULL;
> + return q;
> }
>
> struct vfsmount *collect_mounts(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry)
> @@ -1262,13 +1263,13 @@ static int do_loopback(struct nameidata
> goto out;
>
> clone_fl = (flags & MS_SETUSER) ? CL_SETUSER : 0;
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> if (flags & MS_REC)
> mnt = copy_tree(old_nd.path.mnt, old_nd.path.dentry, clone_fl);
> else
> mnt = clone_mnt(old_nd.path.mnt, old_nd.path.dentry, clone_fl);
>
> - if (!mnt)
> + err = PTR_ERR(mnt);
> + if (IS_ERR(mnt))
> goto out;
>
> err = graft_tree(mnt, nd);
> @@ -1840,7 +1841,7 @@ static struct mnt_namespace *dup_mnt_ns(
> /* First pass: copy the tree topology */
> new_ns->root = copy_tree(mnt_ns->root, mnt_ns->root->mnt_root,
> CL_COPY_ALL | CL_EXPIRE);
> - if (!new_ns->root) {
> + if (IS_ERR(new_ns->root)) {
> up_write(&namespace_sem);
> kfree(new_ns);
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);;
> Index: linux/fs/pnode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/pnode.c 2008-01-04 13:45:46.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/fs/pnode.c 2008-01-04 13:47:49.000000000 +0100
> @@ -189,8 +189,9 @@ int propagate_mnt(struct vfsmount *dest_
>
> source = get_source(m, prev_dest_mnt, prev_src_mnt, &type);
>
> - if (!(child = copy_tree(source, source->mnt_root, type))) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> + child = copy_tree(source, source->mnt_root, type);
> + if (IS_ERR(child)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(child);
> list_splice(tree_list, tmp_list.prev);
> goto out;
> }
>
> --
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/