Re: isofs oops - d_splice_alias+0x1f (2.6.24-rc5-mm1)

[Ingo Molnar]

* David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > FWIW, this patch pile is getting ridiculous - it's what, original + 
> > 2 fixes in -mm + mine + this one?  Could you post the updated patch 
> > with all fixes and fixes to fixes folded into it?
> 
> I can, though Andrew usually objects to that.

folding often results in commit messages and hence credit lost - and 
thus discourages test/review feedback and bugfixing. It's also easier to 
see the track record/history of a patch if the fixes are in separate 
patches. It's also easier to undo a 'fix' (and track the state/version 
of changes) if it turns out to be a bad fix. If things get spaghetti 
then a new splitup indeed helps (for larger patchsets), and Andrew 
usually asks for a new splitup in that case. Andrew often folds patches 
together right before sending it off to Linus (while constructing 
combined credit - so credit is not lost).

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/