Re: [PATCH x86] [12/16] Optimize lock prefix switching to run less frequently

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jan 04 2008 - 07:26:48 EST


On Friday 04 January 2008 10:42:17 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This makes a significant difference in boot up performance on AMD SimNow!
> > Also I expect it to be a little faster on native systems too because a smp
> > switch does a lot of text_poke()s which each synchronize the pipeline.
>
> Please run your patches through checkpatch.pl.
>
> ERROR: use tabs not spaces
> #48: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:360:


I saw a lot of these warnings, but disregarded them as obviously silly. I don't
have plans to redo all the patches for that.

> > +
> > + /* Only switch to UP mode if we don't immediately boot others */
> > + if (num_possible_cpus() == 1 || max_cpus == 0)
>
> Shouldn't this be max_cpus <= 1 ?

Don't think so, smp_init() seems to use it one off.

> > +extern unsigned int max_cpus;
>
> I'm a bit wary about making max_cpus global. max_cpus is used all over
> the place as a local variable name. Can we please rename it to
> setup_max_cpus or something like that?

Hmm, I didn't see any warnings from this so surely it's not a big issue?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/