Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl

[JÃrn Engel]

On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
>  
>  	if (print) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING
> -		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> +		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
> +		       "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
>  		       atomic_read(&audit_lost),
>  		       audit_rate_limit,
>  		       audit_backlog_limit);

This hunk is a bit questionable.  It can easily deceive a reader to
assume two seperate lines printed out and sometimes defeats grepping
for printk output to find the code generating the message.

Rest looks good to me.

JÃrn

-- 
He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book.
-- B. Franklin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/