Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] Add basic support for gcc profilerinstrumentation

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Jan 03 2008 - 04:21:45 EST



* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +# function tracing might turn this off:
> +config REGPARM
> + bool
> + depends on !MCOUNT
> + default y

are you sure -pg really needs this? I just carried this along the years
and went the path of least resistence, but we should not be
reintroducing the !REGPARM build mode for the kernel. I'd not be
surprised if there were a few issues with REGPARM + mcount, but we have
to figure it out before merging ...

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/