Re: [PATCH 1/3] ide: use MODULE_VERSION()

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Wed Jan 02 2008 - 17:34:30 EST


On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:32:36PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 19:33 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > > On the second thought: maybe we will be better off with limiting
> > > MODULE_VERSION() to the device drivers and the IDE core module for now,
> > > and just removing all these private version numbers from host drivers
> > > (with one or two exceptions they are not printed or exported currently,
> > > moreover exceptions are the cases like stale version numbers from 199x)?
> >
> > Things like checkpatch could help advise people to bump the version
> > number, but it's a bit iffy. Matt D. actually uses the special source
> > version modinfo for DKMS - which is different - but it makes me wonder
> > whether dynamically generating a version based on source SHA1 wouldn't
> > be a better idea in most cases than an outdated hard-coded one.
>
> We've got that already, it's called 'srcversion', and it's a CRC32

Neat.

> IIRC after some limited parsing to let it ignore whitspace changes and
> comment changes only.
>
> $ modinfo dell_rbu | grep version
> version: 3.2
> srcversion: 1D4815D7D6FBEE6612F3C18

Unfortunately 'srcversion' is set only if MODULE_VERSION() is used... :(

Anyway I'm dropping this patch and removing all versions from comments
for now (patch #2 respin in few minutes)...

Thanks,
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/