(Try #3) [Patch 7/8] FS: Remove dead code

From: WANG Cong
Date: Wed Jan 02 2008 - 00:55:36 EST


On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:37:29PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:27:37AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> WANG Cong wrote:
>> > TOPDIR is obsolete, use objtree instead.
>> > This patch removes TOPDIR from all fs/ Makefiles.
>>
>> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/Makefile b/fs/xfs/Makefile
>> > index 49e3e7e..d1d3d49 100644
>> > --- a/fs/xfs/Makefile
>> > +++ b/fs/xfs/Makefile
>> > @@ -1 +1 @@
>> > -include $(TOPDIR)/fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL)
>> > +include $(objtree)/fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL)
>>
>> FWIW $(TOPDIR) is already banished from the latest xfs build code:
>>
>Good - I will ignore the xfs bits.

Thanks. I will drop the xfs part.

------->

Remove dead code in smbfs makefile.

Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tim Shimmin <xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>

---

diff --git a/fs/smbfs/Makefile b/fs/smbfs/Makefile
index 6673ee8..4faf8c4 100644
--- a/fs/smbfs/Makefile
+++ b/fs/smbfs/Makefile
@@ -16,23 +16,3 @@ EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DSMBFS_PARANOIA
#EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DDEBUG_SMB_TIMESTAMP
#EXTRA_CFLAGS += -Werror

-#
-# Maintainer rules
-#
-
-# getopt.c not included. It is intentionally separate
-SRC = proc.c dir.c cache.c sock.c inode.c file.c ioctl.c smbiod.c request.c \
- symlink.c
-
-proto:
- -rm -f proto.h
- @echo > proto2.h "/*"
- @echo >> proto2.h " * Autogenerated with cproto on: " `date`
- @echo >> proto2.h " */"
- @echo >> proto2.h ""
- @echo >> proto2.h "struct smb_request;"
- @echo >> proto2.h "struct sock;"
- @echo >> proto2.h "struct statfs;"
- @echo >> proto2.h ""
- cproto -E "gcc -E" -e -v -I $(TOPDIR)/include -DMAKING_PROTO -D__KERNEL__ $(SRC) >> proto2.h
- mv proto2.h proto.h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/