Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove __init modifier from header declaration

[Alexey Dobriyan]

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patch removes the __init modifier from an extern function 
> > declaration in acpi.h.
> > 
> > Besides not being strictly needed, it requires the inclusion of 
> > linux/init.h, which is usually not even included directly, increasing 
> > header mess by a lot.
> 
> thanks, applied.
> 
> btw., people have been talking about reducing the include file mess for 
> nearly a decade now,

Some of us are actually doing it. ;-)

> but it didnt get that much better - at least not in 
> include/asm-x86/*.h.

That's because hunting in include/linux/ is much more fruitful -- it
decreases amount of code after preprocessing for everyone. Below are
allyesconfig on x86_64 results for some kernels:

	$ wc ../*.i
	   79018171   229433654  2049266884 ../2.6.18.i
	   86568111   250674099  2245115663 ../2.6.19.i
	   85187296   247470579  2221334183 ../2.6.20.i		<===
	   88645422   242396928  2234855428 ../2.6.21.i
	   93897302   257990496  2377174442 ../2.6.22.i
	   98381373   268683402  2486321956 ../2.6.23.i

E.g. we can have ~1.07% decrease in cpp output despite ~126000 lines
added between .19 and .20.

> So include file dependency flattening patches would 
> be more than welcome as well.

Yup! Provided they're compile-tested sufficiently well.

> (and unlike unification patches they have 
> no expectation of being 100% perfect, so a natural ping-pong of fixes, 
> until the changes are fully correct, would be natural.)

That way you'll never clean anything especially during merge window. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/