Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Sun Dec 30 2007 - 07:47:38 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 01/12] Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> drivers that then are shown to really need it could use their *own* ports.

The i8259 driver uses it and it is known to be needed on some old chipsets.
But it doesn't really have any "own" ports to use afaik.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 01/12] Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]