Re: [2.6.24 patch] restore blackfin HARDWARE_PM support
From: Robin Getz
Date: Sat Dec 29 2007 - 14:28:14 EST
On Sat 29 Dec 2007 01:23, Mathieu Desnoyers pondered:
> Ok, and do we really need to make HARDWARE_PM a tristate ? I see that
> part of it must be compiled into the kernel in core .S files. Does it
> really make sense for it to be a module ?
I don't think so.
> Also, op_model_bf533.c sits in the arch/blackfin/oprofile directory,
> (built if HARDWARE_PM is y or m) but depends on PROFILING, not OPROFILE.
> Is HARDWARE_PM useful at all without OPROFILE ?
There was an out of tree patch that was floating around that gave people a sys
or proc interface to the hardware registers - since oprofile doesn't work
that well on a bash-less system.
I don't think I will have time to look at the patch over the weekend, but will
do after Jan 1.
-Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/