Re: [PATCH 01/12] Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core

[Dave Young]

>From your previous mail
>You need to actually boot the kernel to get effective reports from
>lockdep, it'll build just fine.

I will post the config file and dmesg with lockdep messages after a while.

On Dec 29, 2007 9:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 09:52 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > Hm, actually it's not so hard, but If I resend the 12 patches seems
> > like spam to lkml :-).
> >
> > Of cource, if you all don't mind and it is really needed, I will do that.
>
> As it stands now I'm quite convinced these patches will make lockdep
> scream bloody murder, so these patches would need quite some more work
> before they're usable.
>
> > >
> > > Also, I don't think your series is bisectable, ie. 1/12 changes
> > > device::sem -> device::mutex, and 12/12 changes a user of it.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't use git tools now. Could you tell me how to fix it?
> > thanks in advance.
>
> Just ensure that the kernel builds after each applied patch. If you're
> using quilt, something like:
>
> while (quilt push && make)
> should finish the whole series.
>
Thanks a lot.

Regards
dave
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/