Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken

[H. Peter Anvin]

Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >
> It's a quite true, sorry for this and thanks for the note. And Peter,
> the line I marked
> is not to be splitted even having additional spaces over  math operators. Look
>
> orig:
> mbr_base = (buf_base+sector_size-1) & ~(sector_size-1);
> new (could be):
> mbr_base = (buf_base + sector_size - 1) & ~(sector_size - 1);
>
> Is a new version that bad?

Certainly isn't any better.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/