Re: [patch, rfc] mm.h, security.h, key.h and preventing namespacepoisoning

From: James Morris
Date: Wed Dec 19 2007 - 23:12:36 EST


On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, David Chinner wrote:

> > I'm not sure I understand your namespace pollution issue, either.
>
> doing this globally:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SOMETHING
> extern int some_common_name(int a, int b, int c);
> #else
> #define some_common_name(a,b,c) 0
> #endif

I suspect it may be useful ensure all global identifiers for the key
subsystem are prefixed with key_, as 'copy_keys' does seem a little
generic.

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > +extern unsigned long mmap_min_addr;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #include <asm/page.h>
> > #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> > #include <asm/processor.h>
>
> Fine by me.

I'll queue it for -mm & 2.6.25.


- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/