Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets

[David Miller]

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:04:53 -0800

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> David Miller wrote:
> > Where does this INDIRECT_PARAM() macro get defined?  I do not
> > see it being defined anywhere in these patches.
> 
> Defined in <linux/indirect.h>:
> 
> +#define INDIRECT_PARAM(set, name) current->indirect_params.set.name
> 
> Not my idea, I was following one review comment.

This was not in the patches you posted, I double checked before
sending my reply.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/