Re: [PATCH] mct232: speed, new termios and compliance cleanups

From: Pete Zaitcev
Date: Tue Nov 20 2007 - 14:04:06 EST


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:22:11 +0000, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>

This looks good, but have a couple of comments. Maybe I can fix it up.

> * we do not know how to support. We ignore them for the moment.
> * XXX Rate-limit the error message, it's user triggerable.

This XXX item is fixed by this patch, so should be removed.

> + /* FIXME: Can we use any divider - should we do
> + divider = 115200/value;
> + real baud = 115200/divider */
> switch (value) {
> case 300: break;

I do not understand this FIXME comment. What is wrong with current
code? The result of the function is given to the device's sequencer.
Do you want to get rid of the switch? Please unconfuse me.

-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/