Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] sys_indirect system call

[Zach Brown]

> This was mentioned in one of my mails.  I added the parameter to
> accommodate Linus's and Zack's idea to use the functionality for syslets
> as well.  Not really a multiplexer, it is meant to be a "execute
> synchronously or asynchronously" flag.  In the latter case an additional
> parameter might be needed to indicate the notification mechanism.

I'm sure the additional parameter will be needed, and it might be pretty
involved.  I think the current notion of syslets needs, at the very least:

 - a userspace stack and IP to return to after going async
 - the completion context when completed async
 - a pointer to a return code when completed without blocking

We'll see.  I'm working on it.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/