Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON

[Andrew Morton]

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:15:52 -0800 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> @@ -35,8 +36,8 @@ struct bug_entry {
>  #define WARN_ON(condition) ({						\
>  	int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);				\
>  	if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) {					\
> -		printk("WARNING: at %s:%d %s()\n", __FILE__,		\
> -			__LINE__, __FUNCTION__);			\
> +		printk("WARNING: at %s:%d %s()  (%s)\n", __FILE__,	\
> +			__LINE__, __FUNCTION__, UTS_RELEASE);		\
>  		dump_stack();						\
>  	}								\
>  	unlikely(__ret_warn_on);					\

that made our 1100-odd WARN_ON sites fatter.

I suppose sometime we should optimise WARN_ON like we did BUG_ON.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/