Hi Ciju:
I am still not exactly sure why this patch is needed. As I read
user_shm_lock():
lock_limit = current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur;
if (lock_limit == RLIM_INFINITY)
allowed = 1;
lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
spin_lock(&shmlock_user_lock);
if (!allowed &&
locked + user->locked_shm > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
goto out;
... if the user's locked limit (ulimit -l) is set to unlimited, allowed
(above) is set to 1. In that case, the second part of that if() is
bypassed, and the function grants permission. Therefore, the easy
solution is to make sure your user's lock_limit is RLIM_INFINITY.
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 19:45 +0530, Ciju Rajan K wrote:
<snip>
@@ -248,8 +249,14 @@ int user_shm_lock(size_t size, struct us
allowed = 1;
lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
spin_lock(&shmlock_user_lock);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
+ if (!allowed &&
+ locked + user->locked_shm > lock_limit &&
+ (!(capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK) || in_group_p(sysctl_hugetlb_shm_group))))
This will allow any user in hugetlb_shm_group to make unlimited use of
huge page shm segments _and_ normal page shm segments. Definitely not
what you want.
+#else
if (!allowed &&
locked + user->locked_shm > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
+#endif
goto out;
get_uid(user);
user->locked_shm += locked;
Please don't add new #ifdefs into .c files, headers only.