Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] x86&x86-64 support for sys_indirect

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Thu Nov 15 2007 - 15:16:55 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
\>> + sys_call_table[INDIRECT_SYSCALL(regs)->eax] ((regs)->ebx,
(regs)->ecx, \
> ^^^^^-> I take it that ->eax is wrong here?

Yep, my bad. I've retired the 32-bit machines around here.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHPKcp2ijCOnn/RHQRAjqMAKCLra+KisV6inTbPrbLtqruDVKyxACgxRLf
kFDyFNbnhqyj3MUkmzV0S2o=
=HQcV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/