Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:40:50AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > These don't apply now due to the x86 merge.  Care to backport them and
> > send them to the stable@xxxxxxxxxx address so we can apply them
> > properly?
> 
> I'm a bit confused.  The patches you mailed out are against arch/i386. 
> Won't they apply to the stable tree as-is?

Was this second series a new set, or a different one?  I was assuming
they were new patches, and that they too needed to be applied.

These patches were sent against the merged x86 tree, not the -stable
tree with i386.

> > Although, it's not like anyone actually uses the in-kernel Xen on
> > 2.6.23, so it's probably not really worth it.
> >   
> 
> To be fair, those fixes were in response to bug reports raised on the
> released 2.6.23 kernel.  But it isn't screamingly urgent.

Ok, that's fine, but can you send some patches that I can apply?  :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/