[patch 27/26] lockdep: fix mismatched lockdep_depth/curr_chain_hash

[Greg KH]

[one more patch added to the 2.6.22-stable queue]


From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>

patch 3aa416b07f0adf01c090baab26fb70c35ec17623 in mainline.

lockdep: fix mismatched lockdep_depth/curr_chain_hash

It is possible for the current->curr_chain_key to become inconsistent with the
current index if the chain fails to validate.  The end result is that future
lock_acquire() operations may inadvertently fail to find a hit in the cache
resulting in a new node being added to the graph for every acquire.

[ peterz: this might explain some of the lockdep is so _slow_ complaints. ]
[ mingo: this does not impact the correctness of validation, but may slow
  down future operations significantly, if the chain gets very long. ]

Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2166,7 +2166,6 @@ out_calc_hash:
 	}
 #endif
 	chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, id);
-	curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;
 
 	/*
 	 * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
@@ -2215,6 +2214,7 @@ out_calc_hash:
 		if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
 			return 0;
 
+	curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;
 	curr->lockdep_depth++;
 	check_chain_key(curr);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/