Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Sigh, I don't really want to have this fight again.
> > 
> > i dont remember us having discussed this before, ever. If there's any
> > "fight" about monotonicity and SMP then it would be a pretty onesided
> > affair, with you being beaten up seriously ;-)
> 
> Actually, it is possible, even for NUMA systems with CPUs running off 
> completely different oscillators, and in the presence of CPU frequency 
> changes, power management, and even in the presence of thermal 
> throttling (though the latter introduces temporary inaccuracies it 
> doesn't affect monotonicity or rate).
> 
> Take a look at the Xen code to see how each physical CPU is 
> independently calibrated on an ongoing basis, how movement of VCPUs 
> between physical CPUs is tracked, and how shared variables are used to 
> ensure montonicity if a guest requires it.

I think that's wishful thinking. Check out:

    http://people.redhat.com/mingo/time-warp-test/time-warp-test.c

change TEST_TSC to 0, run it on an SMP guest (on a reasonably fast 
machine) and let me know whether you can make SMP guests not come up 
with monotonicity violations in the CLOCK tests.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/